Нам по 12 лет, но мы уже разбираемся в гендерной науке, расизме и гомофобии. А еще мы твиттерные оп / Wojak (Вояк) :: SPQR (Приколы для римлян) :: Мемы (Мемосы, мемасы, мемосики, мемесы) :: приколы для римлян :: разное

♂Правильная♂ версия.

Yes.

Кунилингус.

Снизу

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexuality_in_ancient_Rome

Roman men were free to have sex with males of lower status without a perceived loss of masculinity, or even as an enhancement of it. However, those who took the receiving role in sex acts, sometimes referred to as the "passive" or "submissive" role, were disparaged as weak and effeminate, regardless of the sex of their partner (see the section below on cunnilungus and fellatio),[257] while having sex with males in the active position was proof of one's masculinity.[257] Mastery of one's own body was an aspect of the citizen's libertas, political liberty,[258] while the use of one's body to give pleasure to others, whether in homosexual or heterosexual relations, was servile. Laws such as the poorly understood Lex Scantinia and various pieces of Augustan moral legislation were meant to restrict same-sex activity among freeborn males, viewed as threatening a man's status and independence as a citizen.

It was expected and socially acceptable for a freeborn Roman man to want sex with both female and male partners, as long as he took the dominating role.[152] Acceptable objects of desire were women of any social or legal status, male prostitutes, or male slaves, but sexual behaviors outside marriage were to be confined to slaves and prostitutes, or less often a concubine or "kept woman." Lack of self-control, including in managing one's sex life, indicated that a man was incapable of governing others;[153] the enjoyment of "low sensual pleasure" threatened to erode the elite male's identity as a cultured person

Что?

Я за орков играл.